Coal Excise Tax Refunds: United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co. (CRS Report for Congress)
| Release Date |
Revised Sept. 26, 2008 |
| Report Number |
RS22881 |
| Report Type |
Report |
| Authors |
Erika Lunder, American Law Division |
| Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
| Older Revisions |
-
Premium May 16, 2008 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
In 1998, a U.S. district court held that the imposition of the coal excise tax, or black lung excise tax, on exported coal was unconstitutional. Refunding the tax has been controversial. This is because some coal producers and exporters attempted to bypass the limitations in the Internal Revenue Code's refund scheme by bringing suit under the Export Clause in the Court of Federal Claims, seeking damages from the United States in the amount of coal excise taxes paid. The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals held there was Tucker Act jurisdiction to hear some of the suits and allowed them as an alternative to the Code's refund process. However, in a 2008 decision, United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co., the Supreme Court held that taxpayers must comply with the Code's refund process. Meanwhile, several bills would provide an alternative method for coal excise tax refunds, including the amended version of H.R. 6049 (Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008) that was passed by the Senate on September 23, 2008, and H.R. 7060 (Renewable Energy and Job Creation Tax Act of 2008), which was passed by the House on September 26, 2008.
