Considering Regular Appropriations Bills on the House Floor: Current Practice Regarding Comprehensive Unanimous Consent Agreements (CRS Report for Congress)
| Release Date |
Revised Nov. 25, 2008 |
| Report Number |
RS22711 |
| Report Type |
Report |
| Authors |
Christopher M. Davis, Government and Finance Division |
| Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
| Older Revisions |
-
Premium Aug. 23, 2007 (5 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
Regular appropriations bills have traditionally been considered in the House of Representatives under the terms of open rules, which provide substantial freedom of debate and amendment. It has become common, however, for the House to begin considering a spending bill under such an open rule, then quickly negotiate a comprehensive unanimous consent (UC) agreement establishing more structured terms for debating and amending the measure. Such UC agreements seek to strike a balance between the needs of party and committee leaders for efficiency and scheduling predictability, and the desires of rank-and-file Members to debate and freely amend legislation funding the operations of the federal government.
