Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Religious Freedom Restoration Act: An Overview of Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal (CRS Report for Congress)

Premium   Purchase PDF for $24.95 (6 pages)
add to cart or subscribe for unlimited access
Release Date Revised Jan. 10, 2007
Report Number RS22392
Report Type Report
Authors Daniel Schuman, American Law Division
Source Agency Congressional Research Service
Older Revisions
  • Premium   March 2, 2006 (6 pages, $24.95) add
Summary:

On February 21, 2006, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal (UDV), a case addressing the use of an hallucinogenic tea in the context of religious ceremonies conducted by a religious sect in New Mexico. In its decision, the Court determined that under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), the federal government could not prohibit the sect's use of the tea absent a compelling government interest in doing so, and that the federal government had failed to establish a compelling interest. This report provides an overview of RFRA and the O Centro Espirita case.