Debt Relief for Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (35 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
| Release Date |
Revised April 18, 2007 |
| Report Number |
RL33073 |
| Report Type |
Report |
| Authors |
Martin Weiss, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division |
| Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
| Older Revisions |
-
Premium April 18, 2006 (35 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
In recent decades, the rapid growth in poor country debt has emerged as a key foreign policy
concern. Many analysts believe that this debt burden is an impediment to economic growth and
poverty reduction. Others contend that for the poorest countries, other factors such as weak political
and economic institutions, are a greater impediment to growth than the debt burden.
There have been many efforts to help reduce poor country debt. In 1988 a group of major
creditor nations, known as the Paris Club, agreed for the first time to cancel debts owed to them
instead of refinancing them on easier terms as they had done previously. In 1996, the International
Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, and the regional development banks agreed to allow a
portion of debts owed to them by a select group of countries to be cancelled. This effort is known
as the Debt Relief Initiative for Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC). In June 2005, the Group
of Eight (G8) nations agreed to further deepen debt relief and proposed 100% cancellation of all
multilateral debt for countries that have finished the HIPC program. Several pieces of legislation
( H.R. 1130 and S. 1320 ) also have been introduced that could extend debt
relief to an even larger group of countries. As introduced, the G8 proposal raises four possible
concerns:
Scope of Debt Cancellation -- The proposed agreement is limited to
the IMF,
the World Bank, and the African Development Bank. Several other development banks are major
creditors and are not included in the proposal.
No Net New Assistance -- The proposed agreement specifies that
HIPC
countries that receive debt reduction will have their total assistance flows reduced by the amount of
debt forgiven. This money will then be reallocated among all low-income countries.
Funding is Not Assured -- The agreement promises that G8 countries
will
compensate the development banks for any debt relief they provide. However, future contributions
to the development banks are not guaranteed.
Future Commitments are Unspecified -- The agreement commits G8
members to cover the cost of debt relief for countries that may later enter the HIPC process.
Depending on which, if any, countries are added, the potential cost of debt relief may rise
significantly.
No congressional appropriations are required at this time to implement the G8 proposal.
However, additional U.S. funds may need to be appropriated in the future to fund higher levels of
HIPC debt relief.
This report will no longer be updated. For information on the current status of the G8 debt
relief proposal, see CRS Report RS22534 , The Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative , by
Martin A.
Weiss.
