Electronic Voting Systems (DREs): Legislation in the 108th Congress (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (37 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
| Release Date |
Aug. 11, 2004 |
| Report Number |
RL32526 |
| Report Type |
Report |
| Authors |
Eric A Fischer, Resources, Science, and Industry Division; and Kevin Coleman, Government and Finance Division |
| Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Summary:
Several bills have been introduced in the 108th Congress to address issues that have been raised
about
the security of direct recording electronic (DRE) voting machines. Touchscreen and other DREs
using computer-style displays are arguably the most versatile and voter-friendly of any current voting
system. The popularity of DREs, particularly the touchscreen variety, has grown in recent years. In
addition, the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA, P.L. 107 -- 252), while not requiring or
prohibiting the use of any specific kind of voting system, does promote the use of DREs through
some of its provisions. About 30% of voters are expected to use DREs in the November 2004
election. However, there is currently some controversy about how secure DREs are from tampering.
There has been some disagreement among experts about both the seriousness of the security
concerns and what should be done to address them. The bills -- H.R. 2239 (Holt),
S. 1980 (Graham-FL), S. 1986 (Clinton), S. 2045
(Boxer), S. 2313 (Graham-FL), H.R. 4187 (King-IA), S. 2437 (Ensign), and H.R. 4966 (Larson) -- address these concerns
in various ways:
-- Requiring that all voting systems produce a paper ballot that can be verified by a voter
before the
vote is cast ( all except S. 1986 and H.R.
4966 ), or that all voting systems
produce a verifiable ballot using the most accurate technology, which may or may not be
paper-based ( S. 1986 ).
-- Requiring that voting systems used to fulfill HAVA disability requirements use a system
not
requiring paper that provides for voter verification and separates vote generation from vote
casting -- called modular voting architecture -- and providing for assisted voting as an option
for jurisdictions unable to meet the requirement ( H.R. 2239/S. 1980, S.
2045, S. 2313 ).
-- Providing an interim paper-based system to be supplied by the Election Assistance
Commission
(EAC) for states unable to meet the verification requirement ( H.R. 2239/S.
1980, S. 2045, S. 2313 ).
-- Requiring mandatory recounts by the EAC of a small proportion of jurisdictions in each
state
( H.R. 2239/S. 1980, S. 2045, S. 2313 ).
-- Requiring that all voting system software be available for public inspection ("open
source"), as
certified by the EAC ( H.R. 2239/S. 1980, S. 2045, S.
2313 ), or that states be provided with copies of the software ( H.R.
4966 ).
-- Prohibiting the use of wireless communication devices in voting systems, with
certification by the
EAC ( H.R. 2239/S. 1980, S. 1986, S. 2045, S.
2313 ).
-- Requiring adherence to certain security requirements ( all except S.
2437 ).
-- Requiring federal certification of voting systems ( S. 2313 ) or
applying
conflict-of-interest standards to certification laboratories ( H.R. 4966 ).
-- Posting information in the polling place regarding the availability of state administrative
complaint
procedures ( H.R. 4966 ).
-- Requiring development by the EAC of best practices for accessibility and
voter-verification ( H.R.
2239/S. 1980, S. 2045, S. 2313 ).
-- Moving up deadlines for complying with HAVA standards ( H.R. 2239/S.
1980, S. 2045, S. 2313 ).
This report will be updated in response to legislative action on the bills discussed.
