Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

The 2024 Army Force Structure Transformation Initiative (CRS Report for Congress)

Premium   Purchase PDF for $24.95 (17 pages)
add to cart or subscribe for unlimited access
Release Date Revised Aug. 21, 2024
Report Number R47985
Report Type Report
Authors Andrew Feickert
Source Agency Congressional Research Service
Older Revisions
  • Premium   Revised April 30, 2024 (17 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   March 28, 2024 (17 pages, $24.95) add
Summary:

Since the U.S. Army’s inception in 1775, it has reorganized or transformed its force structure on several occasions. These changes have occurred for a variety of reasons, such as shifting security requirements; to fight the nation’s wars and conflicts; the introduction of new weapons, such as tanks and nuclear weapons; and budgetary considerations. The Army has transformed its force structure on four major occasions since 2000: • 2003: The Modular Army; • 2012: Army Drawdown and Restructuring; • 2017: Army Force Structure Decisions; and • 2018: Army’s AimPoint and Army 2030 Force Structure Initiatives. On February 27, 2024, the Army publicly announced “changes to its force structure that will modernize and continue to transform the service to better face future threats. Under the plan, the Army will reorganize over the next decade to ensure it can deliver trained, cohesive and lethal forces to meet future challenges in increasingly complex operational environments.” In conjunction with this announcement, the Army published Army White Paper: Army Force Structure Transformation. As part of this transformation, the Army plans to develop new • Multi-Domain Task Forces (MDTFs), • Indirect Fire Protection Capability (IFPC) battalions, • Counter-Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (C-sUAS) batteries, and • Maneuver Short-Range Air Defense (M-SHORAD) battalions. To transform its force structure, the Army plans to initiate a number of force structure reductions and, at the same time, undertake a number of actions to address recruiting challenges that directly affect the Army’s ability to populate both existing and planned force structures. In addition to forces covered in its February 2024 white paper, the Army reportedly also plans to make force structure changes to its Combat Aviation Brigades (CABs). Potential considerations for Congress include the national security implications of the Army’s planned transformation; the transformation of the Reserve Component; the total cost and duration of the transformation; and additional considerations, such as populating, equipping, and basing the new force structure.