Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Regulation of U.S. Outbound Investment to China (CRS Report for Congress)

Premium   Purchase PDF for $24.95 (3 pages)
add to cart or subscribe for unlimited access
Release Date Revised Aug. 12, 2024
Report Number IF12629
Report Type In Focus
Authors Cathleen D. Cimino-Isaacs; Karen M. Sutter
Source Agency Congressional Research Service
Older Revisions
  • Premium   April 8, 2024 (3 pages, $24.95) add
Summary:

The U.S. government has generally supported an open investment environment at home and abroad to promote U.S. economic growth, sustain the U.S. position as a premier destination for foreign direct investment, and ensure U.S. competitiveness. The U.S. government’s interagency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) reviews a small subset of foreign inbound investments, primarily mergers and acquisitions, that could result in foreign control of a U.S. business and raise potential national security concerns. Since 2016, some Members of Congress have focused on the potential U.S. economic and national security effects of certain U.S. outbound investments to the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China), including the transfer of U.S. technology and know-how in sensitive or strategic areas. The 118th Congress is considering legislation to strengthen foreign investment review authorities and restrict some U.S. investment in the PRC and other “countries of concern” that involves dual-use and critical technology. In response to congressional activity, in August 2023, President Biden issued Executive Order (E.O.) 14105 to establish a targeted outbound investment program. Some countries (e.g., PRC, South Korea, Taiwan) have outbound investment regimes. While the E.O.’s proposed scope of covered activity is limited, it is considered a departure from traditional U.S. economic policy. Opponents argue that existing tools like sanctions and export controls can address risks. Proponents argue that new measures are needed to preserve a marketbased climate and counter PRC policies that incentivize and require the transfer of U.S. technology and capabilities to PRC competitors to benefit the PRC government.