The Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (42 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised Jan. 4, 2021 |
Report Number |
R44308 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
John F. Sargent Jr. |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised Sept. 9, 2019 (40 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Aug. 10, 2018 (36 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 10, 2018 (37 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 27, 2018 (36 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 7, 2018 (36 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Sept. 22, 2017 (36 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Jan. 12, 2016 (34 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
The Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) program is a national network of
centers established by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act (P.L. 100-418). MEP centers
provide custom services to small and medium-sized manufacturers (SMMs) to improve
production processes, upgrade technological capabilities, and facilitate product innovation.
Operating under the auspices of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the
MEP system includes centers in all 50 states and Puerto Rico.
NIST provides funding to support MEP center operations, with matching funds provided by
nonfederal sources (e.g., state governments, fees for services). Initially established with a goal of
transferring technology developed in federal laboratories to SMMs, MEP shifted its focus in the
early 1990s to responding to needs identified by SMMs, including off-the-shelf technologies and
business advice. As MEP evolved, its focus shifted to reducing manufacturing costs through lean
production, quality, and other programs targeting plant efficiencies and to increasing profitability
through growth. Current MEP efforts focus on innovation and growth strategies, cybersecurity,
commercialization, lean production, process improvements, workforce training, supply chain
optimization, and exporting.
In 2017, NIST completed a system-wide revamp of MEP to better align center funding levels with
the national distribution of manufacturing activity and to result in a single center in each state and
Puerto Rico. Other objectives included aligning center activities to the NIST MEP strategic plan;
aligning center activities with state and local strategies; providing opportunities for new
partnering arrangements; and restructuring and reinvigorating the boards of local centers.
As originally conceived, the centers were intended to become self-supporting after six years. The
original legislation provided for a 50% federal cost-share for the first three years of operation,
followed by declining levels of federal support for the final three years; federal funding after a
center’s sixth year of operation was prohibited. In 1998, Congress eliminated the prohibition on
federal funding after year six. In 2017, Congress authorized NIST to provide up to 50% of the
capital and annual operating and maintenance funds required to establish and support a center.
Previously, the federal cost-share was limited to 50% for a center’s first three years of operation,
40% in year four, and one-third in fifth and subsequent years.
The MEP program has, at times, been included in discussions surrounding termination of federal
programs that provide direct support for industry. Invoking the intent of the original legislation,
President George W. Bush proposed in his FY2009 budget to eliminate federal funding for MEP
and to provide for “the orderly change of MEP centers to a self-supporting basis.” Nevertheless,
Congress appropriated $110 million for the program. Proponents assert that SMMs play a central
role in the U.S. economy and that the MEP system provides assistance not otherwise available to
SMMs. Some opponents have asserted that such services are available from other sources and
that MEP inappropriately shifts a portion of the costs of these services to taxpayers.
Continued federal support for MEP centers remains a point of contention. In his FY2018 budget,
President Trump sought to eliminate federal support for MEP centers, requesting $6.0 million for
the program’s “orderly wind down.” The House committee-reported appropriations bill included
$100 million for MEP, while the Senate committee-reported bill included $130.0 million. The
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (P.L. 115-141), provides $140.0 million for MEP for
FY2018. President Trump has again proposed the elimination of MEP in his FY2019 budget.
As Congress makes appropriation decisions, it may continue to discuss support for MEP in the
context of the federal government’s role in bolstering innovation and competitiveness, and in the
context of the appropriate federal role in such activities.