Vulnerable Youth: Background and Policies (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (64 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised Dec. 10, 2020 |
Report Number |
RL33975 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
Adrienne L. Fernandes-Alcantara, Specialist in Social Policy |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised Jan. 30, 2018 (67 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Aug. 2, 2016 (67 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 18, 2015 (72 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 13, 2014 (69 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Oct. 1, 2012 (69 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Aug. 29, 2012 (69 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Sept. 3, 2008 (71 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised June 14, 2007 (78 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium April 24, 2007 (80 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
The majority of young people in the United States grow up healthy and safe in their communities.
Most of those of school age live with parents who provide for their well
-
being, and they attend
schools that prepare them for advanced education or vocational
training and, ultimately, self
-
sufficiency. Many youth also receive assistance from their families during the transition to
adulthood. During this period, young adults cycle between attending school, living independently,
and staying with their families.
A
study from 2009 found that over 60% of young people ages 19
to 22 receive financial support from their parents, including help with paying bills (42%), tuition
assistance (35%), providing personal vehicles (23%
)
, and paying rent (21.5%)
. Even with this
assistance, the current move from adolescence to adulthood has become longer and increasingly
complex.
For vulnerable (or “at
-
risk”) youth populations, the transition to adulthood is further complicated
by a number of challenges, including family conflict
or abandonment and obstacles to securing
employment that provides adequate wages and health insurance. These youth may be prone to
outcomes that have negative consequences for their future development as responsible, self
-
sufficient adults. Risk outcomes i
nclude teenage parenthood; homelessness; drug abuse;
delinquency; physical and sexual abuse; and school dropout. Detachment from the labor market
and school
—
or disconnectedness
—
may be the single strongest indicator that the transition to
adulthood has not
been made successfully.
The federal government has not adopted a single overarching federal policy or legislative vehicle
that addresses the challenges vulnerable youth experience in adolescence or while making the
transition to adulthood. Rather, federal
youth policy today has evolved from multiple programs
established in the early 20
th
century and expanded in the years following the 1964 announcement
of the War on Poverty. These programs are concentrated in six areas: workforce development,
education, ju
venile justice and delinquency prevention, social services, public health, and national
and community service. They are intended to provide vulnerable youth with opportunities to
develop skills to assist them in adulthood.
Despite the range of federal serv
ices and activities to assist disadvantaged youth, many of these
programs have not developed into a coherent system of support. This is due in part to the
administration of programs within several agencies and the lack of mechanisms to coordinate
their act
ivities. In response to concerns about the complex federal structure developed to assist
vulnerable youth, Congress passed the Tom Osborne Federal Youth Coordination Act (
P.L
. 109
-
365
) in 2006. Though activities under the act were never funded, the Interagency Working Group
on Youth Programs was formed in 2008 under Executive Order 13459 to carry out coordinating
activities across multiple agencies that oversee youth program
s.
Separately,
Congress has
considered other legislation to improve the delivery of services to vulnerable youth and provide
opportunities to these youth through policies with a “positive youth development” focus. The
Interagency Working Group on Youth Pro
grams characterizes positive youth development as a
process that engages young people in positive pursuits that help them acquire and practice the
skills, attitudes, and behavior
s that they will need to become successful adults.
In addition to the
Interage
ncy Working Group on
Youth Programs, the executive branch has
established
working groups and
initiatives to
coordinate supports for youth
.
The
Department of
Justice
has carried out
the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
sin
ce the 1970s to coordinate federal policies on youth involved in the juvenile justice system.
More recently, the Obama and Trump Administrations have carried out the Performance
Partnership Pilots (P3) initiative to coordinate funding across selected agenc
ies to support local
communities in serving vulnerable youth.