Artificial Intelligence and National Security (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (43 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
| Release Date |
Revised Nov. 10, 2020 |
| Report Number |
R45178 |
| Report Type |
Report |
| Authors |
Daniel S. Hoadley; Nathan J. Lucas |
| Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
| Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised Aug. 26, 2020 (43 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Nov. 21, 2019 (42 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 30, 2019 (41 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised April 26, 2018 (42 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium April 6, 2018 (42 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly growing field of technology with potentially significant
implications for national security. As such, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) and other
nations are developing AI applications for a range of military functions. AI research is underway
in the fields of intelligence collection and analysis, logistics, cyber operations, information
operations, command and control, and in a variety of semi-autonomous and autonomous vehicles.
Already, AI has been incorporated into military operations in Iraq and Syria. Congressional action
has the potential to shape the technology’s development further, with budgetary and legislative
decisions influencing the growth of military applications as well as the pace of their adoption.
AI technologies present unique challenges for military integration, particularly because the bulk
of AI development is happening in the commercial sector. Although AI is not unique in this
regard, the defense acquisition process may need to be adapted for acquiring emerging
technologies like AI. In addition, many commercial AI applications must undergo significant
modification prior to being functional for the military. A number of cultural issues also challenge
AI acquisition, as some commercial AI companies are averse to partnering with DOD due to
ethical concerns, and even within the department, there can be resistance to incorporating AI
technology into existing weapons systems and processes.
Potential international rivals in the AI market are creating pressure for the United States to
compete for innovative military AI applications. China is a leading competitor in this regard,
releasing a plan in 2017 to capture the global lead in AI development by 2030. Currently, China is
primarily focused on using AI to make faster and more well-informed decisions, as well as on
developing a variety of autonomous military vehicles. Russia is also active in military AI
development, with a primary focus on robotics.
Although AI has the potential to impart a number of advantages in the military context, it may
also introduce distinct challenges. AI technology could, for example, facilitate autonomous
operations, lead to more informed military decisionmaking, and increase the speed and scale of
military action. However, it may also be unpredictable or vulnerable to unique forms of
manipulation. As a result of these factors, analysts hold a broad range of opinions on how
influential AI will be in future combat operations. While a small number of analysts believe that
the technology will have minimal impact, most believe that AI will have at least an
evolutionary—if not revolutionary—effect.
Military AI development presents a number of potential issues for Congress:
What is the right balance of commercial and government funding for AI
development?
How might Congress influence defense acquisition reform initiatives that
facilitate military AI development?
What changes, if any, are necessary in Congress and DOD to implement effective
oversight of AI development?
How should the United States balance research and development related to
artificial intelligence and autonomous systems with ethical considerations?
What legislative or regulatory changes are necessary for the integration of
military AI applications?
What measures can Congress take to help manage the AI competition globally?
