U.S.-Mexico Economic Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (32 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised June 25, 2020 |
Report Number |
RL32934 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
M. Angeles Villarreal, Specialist in International Trade and Finance |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised March 26, 2019 (40 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 25, 2019 (40 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Dec. 6, 2018 (41 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 27, 2018 (38 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 7, 2018 (38 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised April 27, 2017 (37 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Nov. 4, 2016 (36 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 23, 2016 (35 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised April 20, 2015 (37 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Feb. 10, 2015 (37 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 1, 2014 (33 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 19, 2013 (32 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Aug. 9, 2012 (33 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 25, 2012 (30 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Feb. 24, 2011 (31 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Feb. 4, 2011 (31 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Nov. 9, 2010 (30 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 31, 2010 (29 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised April 3, 2009 (27 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised June 3, 2008 (28 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 25, 2008 (27 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised June 1, 2007 (28 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 24, 2006 (27 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 11, 2005 (27 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised May 25, 2005 (26 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Jan. 24, 2005 (27 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
The economic and trade relationship with Mexico is of interest to U.S. policymakers because of
Mexico’s proximity to the United States, the extensive trade and investment relationship under
the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the conclusion of the NAFTA
renegotiations and the proposed U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), and the strong
cultural and economic ties that connect the two countries. Also, it is of national interest for the
United States to have a prosperous and democratic Mexico as a neighboring country. Mexico is
the United States’ third-largest trading partner, while the United States is, by far, Mexico’s largest
trading partner. Mexico ranks third as a source of U.S. imports, after China and Canada, and
second, after Canada, as an export market for U.S. goods and services. The United States is the
largest source of foreign direct investment (FDI) in Mexico.
Most studies show that the net economic effects of NAFTA, which entered into force in 1994, on
both the United States and Mexico have been small but positive, though there have been
adjustment costs to some sectors within both countries. Much of the bilateral trade between the
United States and Mexico occurs in the context of supply chains as manufacturers in each country
work together to create goods. The expansion of trade since NAFTA has resulted in the creation
of vertical supply relationships, especially along the U.S.-Mexico border. The flow of
intermediate inputs produced in the United States and exported to Mexico and the return flow of
finished products greatly increased the importance of the U.S.-Mexico border region as a
production site. U.S. manufacturing industries, including automotive, electronics, appliances, and
machinery, all rely on the assistance of Mexican manufacturers.
Congress faces numerous issues related to U.S.-Mexico trade and investment relations. The
United States, Mexico, and Canada signed the proposed USMCA on November 30, 2018, which
would have to be approved by Congress and ratified by Mexico and Canada before entering into
force. A few days after signing the agreement, President Donald J. Trump stated to reporters that
he intends to notify Mexico and Canada of his intention to withdraw from NAFTA with a six
month notice. Congress may consider policy issues and economic effects of the proposed
USMCA, economic and political ramifications of possibly withdrawing from NAFTA, and the
potential strategic implications of Mexico’s new President Andrés Manuel López Obrador who
entered into office on December 1, 2018. Congress may also examine the congressional role in a
possible withdrawal of NAFTA, evaluate the effects of U.S. tariffs on aluminum and steel imports
from Mexico and Mexico’s retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. exports, address issues related to the
U.S. withdrawal from the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade agreement among
the United States, Canada, Mexico, and nine other countries, and the Comprehensive and
Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), which will enact much of the proposed TPP
without the participation of the United States. The CPTPP is set to take effect for Mexico and five
other countries on December 30, 2018. Some observers contend that the withdrawal from TPP
could damage U.S. competitiveness and economic leadership in the region, while others see the
withdrawal as a way to prevent lower-cost imports and potential job losses.
Congress also may maintain an active interest in ongoing bilateral efforts to promote economic
competitiveness, increase regulatory cooperation, and pursue energy integration. Under the U.S.-
Mexico High Level Economic Dialogue (HLED), which was first launched in September 2013,
the United States and Mexico are striving to advance economic and commercial priorities through
annual meetings at the Cabinet level that also include leaders from the public and private sectors.
Two other initiatives that may be of interest to policymakers are the High-Level Regulatory
Cooperation Council (HLRCC) and the bilateral border management initiative under the
Declaration Concerning 21st Center Border Management.