Long-Range Bombers: Background and Issues for Congress (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (45 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
| Release Date |
Aug. 19, 2003 |
| Report Number |
RL31544 |
| Report Type |
Report |
| Authors |
Pierre Bernasconi and Christopher Bolkcom, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division |
| Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Summary:
The Air Force's long-range bombers were designed during the Cold War to deliver nuclear
strikes
against the Soviet Union. Although they can be vulnerable to enemy defenses if detected, they
combine the ability to fly extended distances, much farther than most other combat aircraft, with the
ability to carry weapons payloads many times larger than that of fighters. Over the past decade, the
Air Force has taken advantage of these characteristics by migrating its bomber fleet from a nuclear
to a conventional role. Today, the Air Force maintains three bombers: the B-1B, the B-2, and the
B-52, and each has been outfitted with a variety of precision and "dumb" weapons for conventional
strikes. In recent conflicts in Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003), bombers have played prominent
roles.
Questions remain, however, about where bombers fit into Air Force spending priorities. Some
argue that because bombers can be vulnerable against advanced air defenses, scarce resources are
best spent on other programs that can address the full spectrum of potential future conflicts, such as
the F/A-22 Raptor. Others counter that the range and payload of the bombers -- many times that of
fighters like the F/A-22 -- make them extremely valuable and believe that modernizing them,
building additional aircraft, and developing a next-generation bomber should be top budget
priorities.
Decisions in Congress and the Department of Defense regarding bombers may have important
long-term implications. Each of the three bombers is in need of expensive upgrades, and decisions
about the funding of these upgrades may affect the continued utility of these aircraft. Second, a
debate has arisen over whether to expand or contract the bomber fleet. Third, military observers and
policymakers disagree about when to begin a next-generation bomber program; some push to begin
a new program immediately, while others advocate waiting a decade or more before initiating
development of a new bomber.
This report discusses the background, status, and current issues surrounding the Air Force's
long-range bomber fleet. Before addressing each of the three bombers individually, this report
analyzes issues affecting the entire fleet.
