Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Jonathan Pollard: Background and Considerations for Presidential Clemency (CRS Report for Congress)

Premium   Purchase PDF for $24.95 (6 pages)
add to cart or subscribe for unlimited access
Release Date Jan. 31, 2001
Report Number RS20001
Report Type Report
Authors Richard A. Best, Jr., and Clyde Mark, Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division
Source Agency Congressional Research Service
Summary:

"Jonathan Jay Pollard and his wife, Anne Henderson Pollard, were arrested in 1985 on charges of spying for Israel. Pollard pleaded guilty and received a life sentence, and remains in prison. Anne Henderson Pollard received a five-year sentence, and was released early in 1989. At first, the Israeli government claimed Pollard’s activities were not sanctioned by the Israeli government and were part of a rogue operation, but the Israeli government granted citizenship to Pollard in 1996, and admitted that Pollard was spying for the government of Israel in 1998. Israeli Prime Ministers on several occasions requested that President Clinton grant clemency to Pollard, but the Clinton Administration ended without a reprieve. It is likely that the Israeli government will raise the issue again and some U.S. groups continue to advocate Pollard’s release. At issue is the question: should the President grant clemency to Jonathan Pollard? Those supporting clemency argue that Pollard has served long enough, that he spied for a friendly nation, not an enemy, that his release will help the peace process, and that the United States reneged on the plea agreement. Those who oppose clemency argue that Pollard’s spying exposed U.S. intelligence methods and personnel, that the Pollard case is not related to the peace process, that who he spied for is irrelevant, and that the judges’ sentence was justified by the magnitude of the crime. The report will not be updated." The report opens with a brief background of the case, followed by a pro-con discussion of presidential clemency.