NAFTA: Economic Effects on the United States After Eight Years (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (20 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
| Release Date |
Aug. 20, 2002 |
| Report Number |
RL31537 |
| Report Type |
Report |
| Authors |
Arlene Wilson, Consultant, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division |
| Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Summary:
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) among the United States, Canada and
Mexico
went into effect on January 1, 1994. It is the first trade agreement the United States has entered into
with a geographically-close developing country and has raised concerns about its economic effect,
particularly on U.S. communities and workers.
Since the mid-1980s, when Mexico began reducing trade restrictions, the U.S. and Mexican
economies have become more highly integrated. This is evidenced by the rapid growth in U.S.
merchandise trade with Mexico, which is now 12% of all U.S. trade (up from 8% in 1993 and 6%
in 1988) and especially by the growth of intra-industry and intra-firm trade. This growing integration
has, by reducing costs, made the U.S. economy (and particularly the Mexican economy) more
productive and globally competitive. Greater integration of the U.S. and Mexican economies
probably would have occurred without the NAFTA, but the NAFTA, by improving business
confidence in Mexico, may have accelerated the process.
The U.S. foreign direct investment position in Mexico grew more rapidly before 1994 than
after, probably in anticipation of NAFTA. Although growing significantly, U.S. foreign direct
investment in Mexico is still relatively small, accounting for 2.8% of all U.S. foreign direct
investment abroad in 2000. U.S. flows of direct investment to Mexico of $3.5 billion in 2000 are
also very small compared with U.S. domestic investment in U.S. plant and equipment of $1,362
billion.
It is estimated that NAFTA caused job dislocation for about 415,000 workers between January
1, 1994 and December 31, 2001, about 34% of whom were in the textile and apparel industry and
5% in the automotive industry. The number of U.S. workers dislocated by NAFTA over eight years
is less than 1% of the 134.3 million U.S. workers employed in 2001.
Nevertheless, a study published in August 2001 by the U.S. General Accounting Office of six
communities who were hard-hit by job dislocation from NAFTA illustrates the need for improving
the skills and job opportunities of dislocated workers. Generally, dislocated workers had less
education than the U.S. workforce as a whole and many had limited English language skills. These
case studies suggest that, in the past, trade adjustment assistance programs did not meet the needs
of the workers in these communities. The Trade Act of 2002 includes provisions that may improve
the effectiveness of trade adjustment assistance.
Overall, the NAFTA has had a relatively small effect on the U.S. economy. Future free trade
agreements between the United States and other countries, which are not major U.S. trading partners
and are geographically further away, will likely have an even smaller effect on the U.S. economy.
This report will not be updated.
