Military Base Closures: Where Do We Stand? (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (13 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
| Release Date |
Revised June 7, 2001 |
| Report Number |
RL30440 |
| Report Type |
Report |
| Authors |
David E. Lockwood, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division |
| Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
| Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised March 7, 2001 (14 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Feb. 18, 2000 (17 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
Approximately 13 years ago, in December 1988, the first military base closure commission
recommended the closing and realignment of 145 U.S. domestic bases and facilities. This action was
the consequence of the Department of Defense's broad reevaluation of its mission in conjunction
with the weakening and ultimate collapse of the Soviet Union. There was little need, according to
the Pentagon, to continue to retain the vast Cold War-era infrastructure. Funds saved from closing
down underutilized bases, DOD further noted, could be used to enhance development of new
weapons and improved readiness.
The 1988 round of infrastructure reductions was followed by three additional rounds in 1991,
1993, and 1995. Since then, no further rounds of base closures and realignments have been
authorized by Congress, despite repeated requests from the Department of Defense in recent years
for two additional rounds. The reasons for congressional resistance are two-fold. First, there is
concern over a likely backlash from constituents living in or near military installations. Second,
many Members of Congress remain wary about a repetition of the perceived political intrusion by
the Clinton Administration that occurred in regard to the 1995 recommendations to close Kelly and
McClellan air force bases.
The four base closure and realignment (BRAC) commissions recommended, individually, a
total of 534 actions to close, realign, or otherwise affect specific bases, facilities, and activities. In
December 1998, the General Accounting Office reported that the four BRAC commissions generated
499 recommendations, but that in its final tally "only 451 of these ultimately required action,
primarily because 48 were changed in some manner by recommendations of a later commission."
The closing of all 451 BRAC installations (major, minor and "other") from the four rounds is
expected to be completed by the end of FY2001, as originally scheduled. The disposing of all the
closed property, however is expected to take many more years. The Pentagon's current estimate of
the percentage reduction in base structure as a result of the first four rounds is 21%. This figure is
used as support for additional infrastructure reductions, since other key indicators, such as the
defense budget and the force structure (personnel and units) have declined 40% and 36%,
respectively.
In terms of costs and savings associated with the first four rounds of closures and realignments,
a DOD report (April 1998) estimated a net total savings of about $14 billion through FY2001. It
projected that net annual savings, thereafter, would be in the vicinity of $5.6 to $5.7 billion. As for
the two new rounds currently being sought, the Pentagon has estimated an annual savings of about
$3 billion after they are implemented.
