Debt Limit Legislation: The House "Gephardt Rule" (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (16 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised Nov. 8, 2023 |
Report Number |
RL31913 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
Bill Heniff, Jr., Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised Feb. 13, 2019 (14 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 27, 2015 (14 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium July 1, 2008 (15 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
Essentially all of the outstanding debt of the federal government is subject to a statutory limit,
which is set forth as a dollar limitation in 31 U.S.C. 3101(b). From time to time, Congress
considers and passes legislation to adjust or suspend this limit.
At the beginning of the 116th Congress, the House adopted a standing rule that would provide for
legislation suspending the statutory debt limit to be considered as passed by the House, without a
separate vote, when the House adopts the budget resolution for a fiscal year. This House rule is
similar to a previous one related to the debt limit (commonly referred to as the “Gephardt rule,”
named after its original sponsor, former Representative Richard Gephardt), which was first
adopted in 1979 but was repealed at the beginning of the 112th Congress in 2011.
The House may also consider debt limit legislation without resorting to the new debt limit rule
(and also did so under the former Gephardt rule) either as freestanding legislation, as part of
another measure, or as part of a budget reconciliation bill. The Senate does not have (and has
never had) a comparable procedure. If it chooses under the new rule to consider such debt-limit
legislation, it would do so under its regular legislative process.
This report first explains the current House debt limit rule, particularly in relation to the former
Gephardt rule. Then, it describes the legislative history of the former rule and reviews how the
former rule operated before it was repealed at the beginning of the 112th Congress.
Under the former Gephardt rule, in 11 of the 31 years between 1980 and 2010, the rule was either
suspended (1988, 1990-1991, 1994-1997, and 1999-2000) or repealed (2001-2002) by the House.
In most years in which the rule was suspended, legislation changing the statutory limit was not
necessary—that is, at the time, the existing public debt limit was expected to be sufficient.
During the years in which the rule applied (i.e., in the 20 of the 31 years between 1980 and 2010),
the rule led to the automatic engrossment of 20 House joint resolutions increasing the statutory
limit on the public debt. In effect, under the rule, in these cases, the House was able to initiate
legislation increasing the level of the public debt limit without a separate, direct vote on the
legislation. Of these 20 joint resolutions, 15 became law. In 10 of these 15 cases, the Senate
passed the measure without change, allowing it to be sent to the President for his signature
without any further action by the House. In the remaining five cases, the Senate amended the
rule-initiated legislation, requiring the House to vote on the amended legislation before it could
be sent to the President.
During this period, the House also originated and considered debt limit legislation without
resorting to the Gephardt rule either as freestanding legislation, as part of another measure, or as
part of a budget reconciliation bill. Of the 47 public debt limit changes enacted into law during
the period 1980-2010, 32 were enacted without resorting to the Gephardt rule, each requiring the
House to vote on such legislation.
In total, between 1980 and 2010, the rule effectively allowed the House to avoid a separate, direct
vote on 10 of the 47 measures changing the debt limit that were ultimately enacted into law.
This report updates the previous one (dated July 27, 2015) with a description of the changes to the
former rule.