Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

The Alabama School Prayer Case: Chandler v. Siegelman (CRS Report for Congress)

Premium   Purchase PDF for $24.95 (6 pages)
add to cart or subscribe for unlimited access
Release Date June 25, 2001
Report Number 98-523
Authors David M. Ackerman, American Law Division
Source Agency Congressional Research Service
Summary:

In Chandler v. James in 1997 a federal district court in Alabama held a statute authorizing "non-sectarian, non-proselytizing, student-initiated voluntary prayer" at all public school events to violate the establishment of religion clause of the First Amendment. To enforce that ruling, Judge DeMent issued an injunction barring the enforcement of the statute and enjoining school officials in DeKalb County, Alabama, from fostering and engaging in a variety of evangelical activities in the schools. That decision and injunction became the subject of intense political controversy in Alabama and elsewhere. Governor James pursued appeals to both the Supreme Court and the Eleventh Circuit contending that the decision and the injunction ought to be vacated on the grounds the establishment clause has no applicability to the states. Both courts denied the Governor's petition. But in a separate appeal by the state Attorney General, the Eleventh Circuit agreed that the injunction's prohibition barring school officials from permitting any student-initiated vocal prayer or devotional speech at school sponsored events violated the students' free speech and free exercise of religion rights. The appellate court upheld, however, the district court's appointment of a monitor to oversee implementation of the injunction. Nonetheless, the court vacated the district court's injunction and remanded it for rewriting in light of the appellate decision. The Supreme Court subsequently vacated this decision for reconsideration in light of its ruling in Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe. But in Chandler v. Siegelman the Eleventh Circuit reaffirmed its previous decision; and on June 18, 2001, the Supreme Court refused to review that reaffirmation. This report will no longer be updated.